Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

UBB Mine Superintendent Charged with Conspiracy, Cover-up, Methane Monitor Violations

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

From minesafety.com

Upper Big Branch Mine Superintendent Gary May has been accused this morning in a criminal information of conspiracy, falsifying examination records, giving advanced notice of MSHA inspections, and ordering methane monitor tampering.

The charges were filed in U.S. District Court in Beckley, W.Va., by U.S. Attorney Booth Goodwin and Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven Ruby.

Methane monitor tampering was first reported in June 2010 when UBB miners Ricky Lee Campbell, Chris Meadows, George Holtzapfel, Clay Mullins and Chuck Nelson publicly talked about methane monitoring tampering with several news organizations (17 MSHN 335).

UBB miner Clay Mullins told Howard Berkes and Frank Langfit of NPR that he was under the belief that if a methane monitor malfunctioned that miners could bridge it out until parts were available to fix it. While the methane monitor did not work, Mullins believed that a hand-held monitor could be substituted as long as methane checks were made every 15 minutes. Nowhere in the regulations is this a permissible substitute.

To read more, click here.

Department of Labor Regulatory Agenda

Monday, February 6th, 2012

By Celeste Monforton

The Republicans’ mantra about the burden of regulations seems to have cast a spell on the Obama Administration’s attitude about promoting new regulatory initiatives. My observations about this were reinforced this week when I read the Administration’s statement accompanying its Fall 2011 regulatory plan. The message is clear: new regulations and an election year don’t mix.

The tone of this new Obama Administration regulatory statement oozes caution. Let’s set aside the fact that this “Fall 2011″ regulatory plan was not released at all in the autumn, but on January 20, 2012. It seems the Obama White House wants to steal ammunition from those who claim there are too many new regulations in the pipeline, and also dampen the expectations of those who expected this Administration to aggressively implement more robust public protection rules.

Read more at the pumphandle.com

Day of Remembrance Set for 10/30

Friday, October 28th, 2011

The U.S. Senate has set October 30th as the day of remembrance for workers of America’s nuclear industry. A statement from USW President Leo Gerard will be posted on the day of remembrance. Ahead of that, here are the words of several senators regarding the day’s significance.

From the press release:

BINGAMAN: “Since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men and women, including uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by building our nuclear defense weapons. I’m glad we’re setting aside time to remember our fellow Americans who have paid a high price for their service to develop the nuclear weapons program for United States.”

ALEXANDER: “There are thousands of Americans who defended our nation during the Cold War, who didn’t serve in the heat of battle but in the laboratory, where they worked with hazardous materials that were little understood at that time. Many of those Americans are sick—more in Tennessee than in any other state—and we should take the time to recognize their quiet sacrifice for our safety and freedom.”

REID: “Nevada’s Cold War veterans and their families served their country at the Nevada National Security Site, where over one thousand nuclear weapons detonations took place over four decades of nuclear testing. This work helped America win the Cold War, but it also left thousands of workers with debilitating illness that far too often led to their premature deaths. It is appropriate for us to dedicate October 30th as a day to remember the tremendous contribution, service, and sacrifice of Nevada’s Cold War veterans, and nuclear weapons workers across the country. Given their immeasurable contributions to our nation’s safety during the Cold War and the great personal sacrifices that they and their families have made, there is no doubt that they deserve this recognition.”

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

10 Things to Know About Wall Street’s Rapacious Attack on America

Friday, October 14th, 2011

But now Americans are fighting back and there’s no telling where Occupy Wall Street can lead.

by Les Leopold

When you climb out of the subway at Wall Street, you might wonder why there are no protestors in the cavernous alley by the stock exchange. That’s because since 9/11, Wall Street has been barricaded shut to prevent possible attacks. But up the block at Zuccotti Park between Liberty and Cedar streets, west of Broadway, the party’s on.

There you’ll find a festive group of about 1,000 people, mostly young folks having a good time accompanied by the occasional cluster of old lefties singing songs. People make signs while sitting on the ground then prop them up wherever they can find a space. They gather at tables filled with donated food and browse boxes of donated books. You also can’t miss the swarm of media folks milling around asking questions, taping interviews and taking notes: they’re the ones in dress suits who spend most of their time interviewing each other. My favorite sign held by an occupier is painted on a skateboard: “This is what Freedom Looks Like.” My son would agree.

And my recurring thought is, “It’s about f’ing time.”

What took us so long? How much worse did it have to get before public outrage would finally focus on those who caused the problem and those who are milking us dry? Several of us have been pleading in blog after blog for more than two years to build a broad-based assault on Wall Street. Where was our answer to the Tea Party? Well, here it is.

There’s no telling where this Occupy Wall Street can lead, especially if a virtuous media feedback loop continues: The more protestors, the more coverage, the more protestors. It’s about the only good thing the mainstream media has done in years.

If unions throw into the mix full force, we may have something powerful in the making. It’s far too early to tell, although the October 5 labor march in New York that drew upwards of 25,000 people was certainly a good sign. Will labor come back and do it again each and every week? Will unions mobilize support for the satellite occupiers in city after city? Or will most of their energy go into the Obama/Democratic Party re-election campaigns as if nothing much has happened? (They should listen to protestors, who agree that corporations and the wealthy are destroying our democracy by buying candidates of both parties.)

Already you can hear the chattering classes mumble about the lack of focus, the lack of consensus and the lack of a coherent agenda in this nascent movement. But they have this coherent call: We are the 99 percent, and we demand our fair share. The irrefutable fact is that 99 percent of us really are being screwed by the 1 percent who are looting our country (actually it’s more like the top 1/10 of one percent). So if you still harbor any doubts that Wall Street is the right target, here are 10 reasons to consider:

1. Wall Street caused the crash: Unless you are suffering from financial amnesia, you should remember that it was Wall Street’s reckless gambling that did us in. It was Wall Street banks and hedge funds, not home buyers, who created the enormous demand for high-risk mortgages to pool, to securitize, and to turn into Ponzi-like gambling structures with names like CDOs, CDO squared and synthetic CDOs. It was the money-grubbing rating agencies that blessed these pieces of garbage with AAA ratings. As a result, trillions of dollars of worthless toxic assets polluted our financial system. When the bubble they induced burst, our system crashed, causing 8 million working people to lose their jobs in a matter of months due to no fault of their own. Anyone who still blames low-income home buyers, or regulations or Greece — or anyone other than Wall Street — should be checked for dementia.

2. The Wall Street crash directly caused the gravest unemployment crisis since the Great Depression: We’re three years into the worst jobs crisis since 1937. Upwards of 29 million people are out of work or have been forced into part-time jobs. The number of people who have been jobless for more than 26 weeks is at post-WWII record levels. And there’s no end in sight to this misery. Meanwhile, Wall Street’s representatives in Washington want us to focus on cutting public employment and public services to address the debt that Wall Street itself precipitated. WE wouldn’t have a debt crisis were it not for the bailouts, the crash, the lost jobs and the soaring cost of jobless benefits that can be laid at Wall Street’s door. (The debt was also caused by tax cuts for the rich, and the bankers certainly don’t want to talk about that.) For those diversionary debt tactics alone, Wall Street should be occupied until it pays to replace the jobs it destroyed.

3. Wall Street profited from the bailouts and remains unaccountable: Taxpayers provided trillions of dollars in cash and asset guarantees to the wealthiest bankers and hedge fund managers in the world. But nothing was extracted from them in return. Here’s one egregious example: Goldman Sachs paid $550 million in SEC fines for selling mortgage-related securities that were designed to fail so that a large hedge fund could bet against them. The securities failed as planned and the hedge fund pocketed $1 billion in profits. But after we bailed out AIG, Goldman Sachs picked up nearly $12 billion for similar bets that AIG had insured. Goldman Sachs collected 100 cents on the dollar and those dollars were ours.

4. The super-rich are getting richer: When the economy was crashing during 2008, high frequency traders in hedge funds and banks made upwards of $20 billion from the turmoil. This trading scam provided no redeeming value to our economy. Rather, it was a hidden tax on our sorrows — a transfer of funds from the many to the few. In 2010 the top hedge fund managers “earned” over $2 million an HOUR! The top 25 hedge fund managers took in as much as 650,000 teachers. Young people have the right to question these lopsided values. All of us have the duty to do something about it.

5. The super-rich are paying lower and lower taxes: While the government pleads poverty when asked to create a massive jobs program, our financial elites use every loophole available to avoid taxes. In 1995, the 400 wealthiest families paid about 30 percent of their income in taxes (after all deductions). Today their effective rate is less than 16 percent. And for what? What did society gain from their retained wealth? Not jobs, not debt reduction, only more Wall Street gambling.

6. Financial elites pay lower taxes than their secretaries: Venture capitalists and private equity fund managers, as well as some hedge fund elites, get a fantastic tax break called “carried interest” that allows them to pay a top rate of 15 percent on their income (rather than the 35 percent top rate regular people pay). This tax break, originally designed for small business partnerships, has made the mega-rich even richer. You might be wondering why this outrageous tax break continues for billionaires. The answer is simple: these elites are pouring money into Washington to make sure that Republicans and Democrats alike keep the loophole in place. Even some liberal Democrats are parroting the line that this tax break for billionaires is good for America. So when the occupiers say they are disenfranchised, they’re right.

7. None of those who caused the crash have been prosecuted: Raj Rajaratnam, the hedge fund billionaire, is going to the hoosegow for insider trading. Bernie Madoff is in prison for life for his Ponzi scheme. And about 40 others have pleaded guilty to insider trading crimes. Yet none of these scoundrels, as immoral as they may be, had much to do with the financial crash. They didn’t peddle toxic mortgage-related securities. They didn’t push predatory loans. They didn’t rate garbage securities as if they were gold. None of these perps pumped up the housing bubble. Those who did are still roaming free, financially armed and dangerous.

8. Wall Street is much too big and its salaries are much too high: The financial sector is supposed to be an intermediary that turns our savings into productive investments. It’s not supposed to be a casino and it’s not supposed to dwarf the rest of the productive economy. But after years of deregulatory foolishness, it has metastasized to destructive levels. From the 1930s until the mid-1970s, financial sector employees earned the same as those in other sectors, relative to their skills and experience. That’s the way it should be. But since we embarked on the long march of financial deregulation and tax breaks for the super-rich, people working in the financial sector have seen their incomes skyrocket compared to everyone else. The bigger that gap, the more danger we face. And unless we build a massive populist uprising, it won’t change.

9. Wall Street still owns the regulators: When you put too much money in the hands of the few and when you deregulate finance, you get a financial casino. That’s what happened in the years leading up to the 1929 crash, and it happened again in 2008. During the New Deal we regulated the tar out of finance, ending their reign of speculative terror. And it worked for nearly a quarter of a century as financial crises virtually disappeared. Since financial deregulation reappeared over the last 30 years, there have been over 180 financial crises around the world. So you would think after 2008, we’d be back to reining in the bankers. But, no…our leaders are afraid to stifle “financial innovation” (See next point.) The Dodd-Frank bill is weak and getting weaker, thanks to intensive Wall Street lobbying. High government officials still believe that Wall Street can lead the nation forward. The kids are telling us that we should shut down the casinos now. Right again.

10. Financial innovation is a joke: Washington genuflects before the gods of financial innovation: the adjustable no-money down mortgages with resetting teaser rates, the synthetic collateralized debt obligations that turn garbage mortgages into AAA securities, the credit default swaps that are financial insurance policies without regulation, the nanosecond trading programs that flip millions of stocks per second while milking slower investors, and the myriad of ways to make enormous financial bets using little or none of your own money. They tremble at the thought of whispering anything that might stifle these highly profitable Wall Street inventions. They are wowed by trading measured in nanoseconds, by the alphabet soup of securities, by the dark pools of financial trading and most of all by financial billionaires and their lobbyists. But to paraphrase former fed chair Paul Volcker, the only real financial innovation in the last 25 years is the ATM machine. The rest are simply gambling games designed to enrich Wall Street’s elites who pocket the winnings and pawn off the losses on us. The protesters sense the game is rigged. It is.

Does Wall Street pay or do we? In the end, it comes down to a clear-cut struggle between the few and the many. (There’s that 99 percent again.) Who is going to pay for the jobs we need? Who is going to pay for the debt that was created to bail out Wall Street and prevent another Great Depression? Wall Street wants us to pay in the form of cuts in Social Security and medical coverage, reduced wages and higher taxes (for everyone but them). In fact, they want the kids to pay by working longer before they retire (if they can ever find a job), paying higher medical costs as they grow older, and turning their Social Security accounts into Wall Street playthings no one can rely on. At the same time financial elites are arguing for fewer regulations and lower taxes on themselves and their fellow millionaires and billionaires. Financial interests are hoping we’ll simply forget who caused what and instead focus on debt, more debt and still more debt. They’re hoping we’ll blame government, regulations and taxes, while they laugh all the way to the bank – their banks. Some of us may be old and tired and fatalistic about all this looting, and sour about the chances for change. Thank god the kids still have their wits about them—and a fighting spirit.

Get out there and join them. And if you’re too old to stay overnight (like me), visit often and urge your unions, churches and community groups to join the fray. A progressive populist uprising only works when it’s large, vocal and full of spunk.

Go occupiers, go!

Post originally appeared on Alternet.

Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and Public Health Institute in New York, and author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street’s Game of Fantasy Finance Destroyed Our Jobs, Pensions, and Prosperity—and What We Can Do About It (Chelsea Green, 2009).

Scandal Among Money Made for BP Cleanup

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

gt_taffaro_jindal_300x200_110718After the BP oil spill, ProPublica found evidence of exorbitant amounts of money given out for cleanup that may have been used less than honestly. Their findings were recently called into question and, in an effort to defend themselves, ProPublica uncovered even more evidence of funding abuse.

From ProPublica:

New documents obtained by ProPublica, however, show that BP’s auditors repeatedly questioned bills submitted by St. Bernard contractors, including three with ties to Taffaro, based on suspicions that they had overcharged or charged for permanent parish improvements unrelated to the spill.
Other reporting shows that six of Taffaro’s associates got BP work last summer potentially worth millions of dollars. A seventh, Taffaro’s biggest campaign donor, loaned money to help the parish’s main spill contractor—a company picked by Taffaro. These seven men subsequently joined Taffaro’s re-election committee. One, an old friend of Taffaro’s who landed the BP catering job, solicited others working on the spill for donations to Taffaro’s campaign, according to an email sent on the man’s behalf.

New documents obtained by ProPublica, however, show that BP’s auditors repeatedly questioned bills submitted by St. Bernard contractors, including three with ties to Taffaro, based on suspicions that they had overcharged or charged for permanent parish improvements unrelated to the spill.

Other reporting shows that six of Taffaro’s associates got BP work last summer potentially worth millions of dollars. A seventh, Taffaro’s biggest campaign donor, loaned money to help the parish’s main spill contractor—a company picked by Taffaro. These seven men subsequently joined Taffaro’s re-election committee. One, an old friend of Taffaro’s who landed the BP catering job, solicited others working on the spill for donations to Taffaro’s campaign, according to an email sent on the man’s behalf.

Read more.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

TMC Summer Internship

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

The Tony Mazzocchi Center is pleased to announce the 2011 Summer Internship. Details below:

Who:
• Member from USW or CWA local union

When:
• June 1, 2011 – August 31, 2011 (dates flexible)

Where:
• Pittsburgh, PA (travel required) Housing provided

Where to find:
• Advertised via TMC website and via TMC trainer email, TMC twitter account

Why:
• To develop health & safety activists and fulfill the TMC needs outlined below.

What:
• Utilize workplace health & safety program effectiveness survey
o cross-section of USW and CWA represented workplaces
o send and receive surveys
o analyze results
o write analysis (consider presentation at 2012 APHA conference)
• Social media responsibilities
o Expand TMC email listserve
o write blogs at least one weekly
• Perform at least 2 plant visits and perhaps one or more ERT responses (with an HSE staff member) Work on fatality review with Anna Fendley Geo-code the TMC trainer database other as assigned (5%)

Financial:
• Five days a week ($280/day – $46 per Diem)
• Travel provided initial to and final from Pittsburgh
• Travel provided to home and back to Pittsburgh for July 4th weekend
• Office and equipment provided

Requirements:
• Established history of union activism
• Support from Local and District
• Computer skills including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, emailing, website
navigation. Preferred experience with social media.
• Experience with the USW Health, Safety and Environment Department
and Tony Mazzocchi Center programs.

Applications:
​Apply by email to Mike Gill at mgill@uswtmc.org no later than May 13, 2011. Please provide a brief bio reflecting your work within the Union and your community as well as the requirements listed.

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

Frustration Grows Over Gulf Spill Claims Process

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

110214-spill1-hmed2-240p.grid-3x2

Photo courtesy of MSNBC.

With less than $4 billion of the $20 billion available paid out to claims to the Gulf Coast Claims Facility, lawmakers and Gulf Coast residents are starting to point fingers and denounce the so-called ‘transparency’ of the process.

From MSNBC:

Tens of thousands of fishermen, oyster shuckers, business owners, hotel operators and hairdressers still await payment. Many others whose claims have been turned down question the evenhandedness. And without the data to determine who is right, attorneys general and members of Congress question the openness.

A main target of the growing vitriol is Washington, D.C. attorney Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of overseeing the claims process. Praised for his role in managing claims after 9/11, Feinberg claims his work is made difficult by the need to sift through bogus claims.

From MSNBC:

He has acknowledged that the system is clogged by the sheer volume of oil spill claims, along with inflated or outlandish requests. Among them: One person filed a claim for the entire $20 billion, while another asked for $10 billion; a boat captain sought reimbursement for lost income for himself and four deckhands, but it turns out he didn’t have any deckhands; and a fisherman claimed he lost a month on the water, but his boat had a hole in it and was dry-docked even before the spill.

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

The Role of Labor in Egyptian Unrest

Monday, January 31st, 2011

Egypt Protests

Photo courtesy of Dreams of a Typewriter.

The Awl has a piece up discussing the role labor movements and workers have played in the unfolding turmoil in Egypt. While this aspect of the unrest has evaded most media coverage, the labor situation in Egypt deserves a close look.

From The Awl:

From 2004 to 2008 alone, about 1.7 million workers have engaged in 1,900 strikes and other forms of protest, demanding everything from wage increases to job security in state-owned industries that were privatized.

Labor movements live and die in regime changes: for instance, Iran’s vigorous labor movement that was destroyed in 1953; similarly, labor movements can be strangled when support to them is denied by allies and neighbors, as in the Tunisian labor movement of the mid-1920s.

The post includes several links to detailed explanations of Egypt’s labor struggle, including a social history, a look at trade unions, and a summary of the widespread use of child labor. Let us not forget the struggle of Egypt’s mistreated workers in the midst of the continued conflict.

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

Following Study Results, USW Calls for CT Screens for Lung Cancer

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

A National Cancer Institute study of 53,000 30-year smokers found that CT scans may succeed in early detection of lung cancer at a rate 20% higher than traditional x-rays. Researchers are encouraged by the first evidence that CT scans may provide an advantage in the fight against lung cancer, so much so that the trial was stopped after a panel reviewed the initial results. Analysis of the study will focus on who will benefit most from CT scanning as well as the risk of regular scans versus the risk of disease.

From the New York Times:

No screening method had proved effective at reducing mortality from the disease. Four randomized controlled trials done during the 1970s showed that chest X-rays, while they helped catch cancers at an earlier stage, had no effect on overall death rates. Since then, researchers have suggested that CT scans — which use coordinated X-rays to provide three-dimensional views — could detect lung tumors at an even earlier stage than X-rays.

“This is the first time that we have seen clear evidence of a significant reduction in lung cancer mortality with a screening test in a randomized controlled trial,” said Dr. Christine Berg of the National Cancer Institute.

The results come as promising news to health activists, many of whom are now promoting regular CT scans as a preventative measure against lung cancer. USW International President Leo Gerard has called for regular screening for high-risk workers exposed to known carcinogens.

From the USW News Release:

The United Steelworkers today issued an urgent call for a strategy meeting about occupational lung cancer medical screening. Last week, the National Cancer Institute released the results of a 10 year national study involving over 53,000 people that demonstrated that annual medical screening with a low dose helical chest CT scan lowered mortality due to lung cancer by 20%.

“We are now presented with an enormous opportunity to save workers from dying from lung cancer,” said USW International President Leo W. Gerard. “Millions of workers have been exposed to asbestos, silica, chromium, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, nickel and combustion products – and all of these exposures are firmly established as causes of human lung cancer.”

The USW and the Tony Mazzocchi Center sponsor the Early Lung Cancer Detection program – the largest program of its kind – which uses the same low-dose CT scan as the NCI trial. Co-sponsored by Queens College of the City University of New York and the Atomic Trades & Labor Council, the program has scanned some 10,000 nuclear weapons workers in the last decade. 70 cases of lung cancer have been discovered in the workers, many of whom have been exposed to widely-used toxic occupational chemicals. Three-quarters of the cancers found were in treatable early stages.

From the USW News Release:

“The goal is straightforward but urgent,” said Steven Markowitz, MD, the occupational medicine physician who directs the USW’s Early Lung Cancer Detection Program. “Workers at high risk of lung cancer should have rapid access to a high quality, appropriate, comprehensive CT scan-based lung cancer screening services without financial barriers. We can save many lives.”

Union leaders will now work to urge lawmakers to make the CT scans readily available, first by ensuring workers are notified when they are at high risk, then by revising OSHA medical surveillance standards to include the screenings and appropriating funding for such screening.

Do you work in a high-risk environment? Occupational lung cancer claims between 10,000 and 20,000 lives per year, more than any other disease of its nature. Share your story in the comments.

BOEMRE Expedition Finds Damaged Coral from BP Spill

Monday, November 8th, 2010

The first evidence of long-term environmental damage stemming from the Deepwater Horizon disaster has come in the form of damaged coral, according to an extended study led by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The devastated coral population occurs several miles southwest of the ill-fated BP well, and is the first sign that the environmental toll of the spill may be far greater than what federal officials have stated. Tests still need to be conducted to confirm the origin of the brown sludge covering the coral in the studied region, but the evidence refutes federal reports that said most of the oil released into the Gulf had naturally dissipated.

From USA Today:

“What we have at this point is the smoking gun,” said Charles Fisher, a biologist with Penn State University who led the expedition aboard the Ronald Brown, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research vessel.

“There is an abundance of circumstantial data that suggests that what happened is related to the recent oil spill,” Fisher said.

“These kinds of coral are normally beautiful, brightly colored,” Fisher said. “What you saw was a field of brown corals with exposed skeleton — white, brittle stars tightly wound around the skeleton, not waving their arms like they usually do.”

Fisher described the soft and hard coral they found seven miles southwest of the well as an underwater graveyard. He said oil probably passed over the coral and killed it.

The coral has “been dying for months,” he said. “What we are looking at is a combination of dead gooey tissues and sediment. Gunk is a good word for what it is.”

The coral in the Gulf provides the home to many organisms harvested by Gulf fisherman. Devastation to the coral population means widespread devastation to other species that may take years to manifest.

Submitted by Patrick McQueen