Archive for May, 2011

Join the Social Media Revolution!

Friday, May 27th, 2011

The social networking revolution is here to stay so join the conversation by becoming part of the United Steelworker’s growing new media community. You’ll find more ways to quickly get news and information from your union that’s important to you and your family, and you’ll be able to connect with other Steelworkers and friends! If you have already joined, please encourage others to do so by passing on the links to our various networks.

We’re on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Flickr. Right now, we’re trying something fun:  when we hit 5,000 fans who “like” our official Facebook page, all our fans will be entered into a chance to win a cool prize pack filled with goodies from the Steelworker Store. One lucky winner will be drawn at random – so pass the word and ask everyone you know to like us on Facebook! If you’re new to the world of social networking and the World Wide Web, don’t fret. We walk you though it step-by-step on our Web page. For those seeking the latest health, safety, and environment news and events, remember to ‘like’ the Tony Mazzocchi Center on Facebook and follow them on Twitter, too.

Remember, the best prize of all is a well-educated, well-connected corps of activists who can keep standing and fighting for our future, and these social networks are just some of the many tools we use to help achieve that goal.

Thanks for all you do and see you online!

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

OSHA Releases New Guidelines for Residential Construction

Friday, May 27th, 2011

Commercial_Construction_LoanOSHA has released a new presentation to teach residential construction companies how to properly protect their employees from falling and hurting themselves on the job.

From the OSHA site:

This slide presentation is one of many formats OSHA is using to reach out to the residential construction industry and provide information and assistance to employers in residential construction. In December 2010, OSHA announced a new directive withdrawing a former interim directive that allowed residential builders to bypass fall protection requirements. Falls are the leading cause of death for workers involved in construction.

The presentation describes safety methods for preventing injuries and deaths from falls, and explains techniques currently used by employers during various stages of construction. These techniques involve the use of conventional fall protection systems including safety nets, guardrails, and personal fall arrest systems such as body harnesses, lanyards and lifelines. Workers who use these safety systems perform activities such as installing roof sheathing, weatherproofing a roof, and installing walls and subfloors, among others.

Read more.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

“Massey Hasn’t Changed”

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

massey-adkins-300x200Despite the tragedy at the Massey Upper Big Branch mine last year, according to a new report on the tragedy, the company has not changed and has done little to prevent a new disaster.

From the ProPublica article:

“It is only in the context of a culture bent on production at the expense of safety that these obvious deviations from decades of known safety practices make sense,” the report said. It also noted that the company’s practices haven’t improved much—if at all—since the disaster occurred.
“More than a year after 29 men died in the Upper Big Branch mine, there is strong evidence that Massey has not changed the manner in which it operates its mines,” the report said.
Investigators said the coal giant had “used the leverage of jobs it provided to attempt to control West Virginia’s political system,” casting inspectors, regulators, and even politicians and community residents as enemies. According to the report, the company’s former CEO, Don Blankenship instilled fear in local politicians by spending “vast amounts of money to influence elections.”

“It is only in the context of a culture bent on production at the expense of safety that these obvious deviations from decades of known safety practices make sense,” the report said. It also noted that the company’s practices haven’t improved much—if at all—since the disaster occurred.

“More than a year after 29 men died in the Upper Big Branch mine, there is strong evidence that Massey has not changed the manner in which it operates its mines,” the report said.

Investigators said the coal giant had “used the leverage of jobs it provided to attempt to control West Virginia’s political system,” casting inspectors, regulators, and even politicians and community residents as enemies. According to the report, the company’s former CEO, Don Blankenship instilled fear in local politicians by spending “vast amounts of money to influence elections.”

Read more.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

Report Finds Massey at Fault

Friday, May 20th, 2011

WVAMINES

A new report has been released by a top mine regulator citing the Massey Energy in the Upper Big Branch mine disaster in April of last year.

From the Wall Street Journal:

The 120-page report released Thursday by J. Davitt McAteer, the top mine regulator during the Clinton administration, is the first comprehensive account of the explosion at Massey’s Upper Big Branch mine in Montcoal, W.Va., on April 5, 2010, the worst U.S. coal-mining disaster in 40 years. A vice president at Wheeling Jesuit University in Wheeling, W.Va., Mr. McAteer was asked last year by then-Gov. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, to conduct the probe.
In the report, miners described conditions just before the explosion and afterward, when hurricane-like winds tore off their hard hats. One survivor talked of his failed efforts to save fellow miners overcome by carbon monoxide before reluctantly leaving them behind.
It’s unclear if the report will lead to new mine-safety legislation in Congress, which has been divided over the need for changes. The report could provide fodder for dead miners’ families suing Massey, and could complicate the company’s settlement efforts with other families.

The 120-page report released Thursday by J. Davitt McAteer, the top mine regulator during the Clinton administration, is the first comprehensive account of the explosion at Massey’s Upper Big Branch mine in Montcoal, W.Va., on April 5, 2010, the worst U.S. coal-mining disaster in 40 years. A vice president at Wheeling Jesuit University in Wheeling, W.Va., Mr. McAteer was asked last year by then-Gov. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, to conduct the probe.

In the report, miners described conditions just before the explosion and afterward, when hurricane-like winds tore off their hard hats. One survivor talked of his failed efforts to save fellow miners overcome by carbon monoxide before reluctantly leaving them behind.

It’s unclear if the report will lead to new mine-safety legislation in Congress, which has been divided over the need for changes. The report could provide fodder for dead miners’ families suing Massey, and could complicate the company’s settlement efforts with other families.

Read more.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

Washington Requires Businesses To Correct Hazards During Appeal

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

Up until now, when companies in Washington violated safety rules and put their workers at risk, companies were allowed to let those hazards stand while they appealed their fines and citations. As a result, workers were continually put at risk and, often, hurt by the hazards their companies were slow in fixing. Now, thanks to a bill just signed in the Washington Senate, companies must fix hazards even if they are appealing the citation.

From the WISHA press release:

“This change to our state worker safety laws offers significant improvement for worker safety,” said Michael Silverstein, assistant director, L&I Division of Occupational Safety and Health. “This allows us to ensure that hazards are corrected even as we continue discussions with employers who may disagree with our citations.”
Under existing rules, if a business appeals an L&I citation involving a serious workplace safety violation, there is no obligation to correct the hazard for which they were cited until the appeal is resolved. This can take months or even years and expose some workers to uncorrected hazards.
For example, one company was cited in 2006 for several serious violations after a worker suffered lead poisoning. The company appealed and did not correct the hazards during the appeal process. The citation was upheld. However, before the company corrected the hazards, a second worker also suffered lead poisoning.
Nationally, a recent analysis by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found that in the decade between 1999 and 2009, there were at least 30 appealed cases where a fatality occurred at the same site before the appeal was resolved.

“This change to our state worker safety laws offers significant improvement for worker safety,” said Michael Silverstein, assistant director, L&I Division of Occupational Safety and Health. “This allows us to ensure that hazards are corrected even as we continue discussions with employers who may disagree with our citations.”

Under existing rules, if a business appeals an L&I citation involving a serious workplace safety violation, there is no obligation to correct the hazard for which they were cited until the appeal is resolved. This can take months or even years and expose some workers to uncorrected hazards.

For example, one company was cited in 2006 for several serious violations after a worker suffered lead poisoning. The company appealed and did not correct the hazards during the appeal process. The citation was upheld. However, before the company corrected the hazards, a second worker also suffered lead poisoning.

Nationally, a recent analysis by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found that in the decade between 1999 and 2009, there were at least 30 appealed cases where a fatality occurred at the same site before the appeal was resolved.

Read more here.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

OSHA Introduces Injury and Illness Prevention Programs Webpage

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

20110517-120925.jpg

OSHA recently introduced a webpage dedicated to the injury and illness prevention programs they see saving lives in American workplaces. The site serves as a resource to workplaces looking to emulate the best practices in their respective industry.

From the website:

Injury and Illness Prevention Programs, known by a variety of names, are universal interventions that can substantially reduce the number and severity of workplace injuries and alleviate the associated financial burdens on U.S. workplaces. Many states have requirements or voluntary guidelines for workplace injury and illness prevention programs. Also, numerous employers in the United States already manage safety using Injury and Illness Prevention Programs and we believe that all employers can and should do the same. Most successful injury and illness prevention programs are based on a common set of key elements. These include: management leadership, worker participation, hazard identification, hazard prevention and control, education and training, and program evaluation and improvement. This topics page provides information relevant to Injury and Illness Prevention Programs in the workplace.

View the website here.

Submitted by Patrick McQueen

OSHA Updates Shipyard Regulations

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

shipyard-big1OSHA has recently made updates to their shipyard regulations, mostly concerning electrical equipment, to take effect August 1, 2011. From OH&S:

The rule takes account of the unique hazards and nature of shipyard employment. Work is done aboard vessels, in confined or enclosed spaces below deck, on scaffolds, and on busy, crowded docks. “The safe coordination of shipyard employment activities also is complicated by the fact that most shipyards are multi-employer worksites where shipyard workers, ship’s crew, contractors, and subcontractors work side-by-side and often on the same vessel system at the same time,” the rule’s text states. “The combination of these hazards puts workers at risk of injury, regardless of whether they are working on vessels or at landside operations.”

The rule takes account of the unique hazards and nature of shipyard employment. Work is done aboard vessels, in confined or enclosed spaces below deck, on scaffolds, and on busy, crowded docks. “The safe coordination of shipyard employment activities also is complicated by the fact that most shipyards are multi-employer worksites where shipyard workers, ship’s crew, contractors, and subcontractors work side-by-side and often on the same vessel system at the same time,” the rule’s text states. “The combination of these hazards puts workers at risk of injury, regardless of whether they are working on vessels or at landside operations.”

Read more.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

OSHA Holds Combustible Dust Forum

Friday, May 6th, 2011
Since 1980, nearly 150 workers have been killed and more than 850 injured in combustible dust explosions. To explore methods for preventing such explosions, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration invited outside experts to participate in a Combustible Dust Expert Forum May 13, 2011. OSHA will gather experts’ views on possible regulatory options for addressing combustible dust hazards.
Discussions will include identifying regulatory options that can minimize the costs to small- and medium-sized businesses of reducing or preventing combustible dust hazards, while protecting workers from these hazards. Representatives from various industries, academia, research groups, insurance-underwriter organizations, labor, and government will comprise expert representation.
OSHA’s earlier efforts to address combustible dust hazards included a National Emphasis Program in 2007 that targeted inspection efforts on facilities that create or handle combustible dusts. Results from these inspections indicated that facilities had unusually high numbers of general duty clause violations, indicating a strong need for a combustible dust standard. This effort was followed by publication of an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2009, from which the agency received more than 100 comments. Additionally, OSHA held six stakeholders meetings and conducted a Web chat on combustible dust to expand the opportunity for public and stakeholder participation. The agency recognizes the importance of considering options for addressing combustible dust hazards, particularly as they may affect small facilities, in preparation for convening a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act panel.
Combustible dusts include fine particles, fibers, chips, chunks or flakes that, under certain conditions, can cause a fire or explosion when suspended in air. Types of dusts include metal (for example, aluminum and magnesium), wood, plastic, rubber, coal, flour, sugar and paper, among others. Visit OSHA’s Safety and Health Topics page on Combustible Dust to learn more about this dangerous hazard.
The forum will be held at 9 a.m. at the Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. There will be limited space available for non-participating observers, so OSHA asks that only one representative from interested organizations register as an observer. To register as a non-participating observer, contact Bill Hamilton at 202-693-2077 by May 6, 2011. A summary of the forum will be available soon after the meeting on OSHA’s Combustible Dust Web page.

osha-logoOSHA is holding a forum on May 13th in an effort to develop new regulations for preventing combustible dust explosions.

From the OSHA release:

Since 1980, nearly 150 workers have been killed and more than 850 injured in combustible dust explosions. To explore methods for preventing such explosions, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration invited outside experts to participate in a Combustible Dust Expert Forum May 13, 2011. OSHA will gather experts’ views on possible regulatory options for addressing combustible dust hazards.

Discussions will include identifying regulatory options that can minimize the costs to small- and medium-sized businesses of reducing or preventing combustible dust hazards, while protecting workers from these hazards. Representatives from various industries, academia, research groups, insurance-underwriter organizations, labor, and government will comprise expert representation.

OSHA’s earlier efforts to address combustible dust hazards included a National Emphasis Program in 2007 that targeted inspection efforts on facilities that create or handle combustible dusts. Results from these inspections indicated that facilities had unusually high numbers of general duty clause violations, indicating a strong need for a combustible dust standard. This effort was followed by publication of an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2009, from which the agency received more than 100 comments. Additionally, OSHA held six stakeholders meetings and conducted a Web chat on combustible dust to expand the opportunity for public and stakeholder participation. The agency recognizes the importance of considering options for addressing combustible dust hazards, particularly as they may affect small facilities, in preparation for convening a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act panel.

Combustible dusts include fine particles, fibers, chips, chunks or flakes that, under certain conditions, can cause a fire or explosion when suspended in air. Types of dusts include metal (for example, aluminum and magnesium), wood, plastic, rubber, coal, flour, sugar and paper, among others. Visit OSHA’s Safety and Health Topics page on Combustible Dust to learn more about this dangerous hazard.

The forum will be held at 9 a.m. at the Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. There will be limited space available for non-participating observers, so OSHA asks that only one representative from interested organizations register as an observer. To register as a non-participating observer, contact Bill Hamilton at 202-693-2077 by May 6, 2011. A summary of the forum will be available soon after the meeting on OSHA’s Combustible Dust Web page.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato

OSHA Releases New Heat Safety Program

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

You'll Last Longer After A Little Rest
OSHA has released a new program meant to battle heat related injuries in the workplace. From OSHA’s website:

“If you’re working outdoors, you’re at risk for heat-related illnesses that can cause serious medical problems and even death,” said Secretary Solis. “But heat illness can be prevented. This Labor Department campaign will reach across the country with a very simple message – water, rest and shade.”
Each year, thousands of outdoor workers experience heat illness, which often manifests as heat exhaustion. If not quickly addressed, heat exhaustion can become heat stroke, which killed more than 30 workers last year.
“As we move into the summer months, it is very important for workers and employers to take the steps necessary to stay safe in extreme heat,” said OSHA Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels. “Drinking water often, taking breaks and limiting time in the heat are simple, effective ways to prevent heat illness.”
Heat can be a real danger for workers in jobs ranging from agriculture and landscaping to construction, road repair, airport baggage handling and even car sales.

“If you’re working outdoors, you’re at risk for heat-related illnesses that can cause serious medical problems and even death,” said Secretary Solis. “But heat illness can be prevented. This Labor Department campaign will reach across the country with a very simple message – water, rest and shade.”

Each year, thousands of outdoor workers experience heat illness, which often manifests as heat exhaustion. If not quickly addressed, heat exhaustion can become heat stroke, which killed more than 30 workers last year.

“As we move into the summer months, it is very important for workers and employers to take the steps necessary to stay safe in extreme heat,” said OSHA Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels. “Drinking water often, taking breaks and limiting time in the heat are simple, effective ways to prevent heat illness.”

Heat can be a real danger for workers in jobs ranging from agriculture and landscaping to construction, road repair, airport baggage handling and even car sales.

Visit the website and access the resources here.

Submitted by Andrew Fatato